Migration
ShareGate vs AvePoint
Quick Verdict
Shortlist ShareGate for practical SharePoint and Teams migration with approachable admin workflows. Shortlist AvePoint when the program also needs broader governance, backup, records, compliance, or enterprise data management capabilities.
At a Glance
| Criteria | ShareGate | AvePoint |
|---|---|---|
| Primary lens | Migration and management productivity | Governance, migration, backup, and data management portfolio |
| Typical buyer | Microsoft 365 admins and migration teams | Enterprise IT, governance, compliance, and platform teams |
| Scope | Focused Microsoft 365 migration/admin scenarios | Broader Microsoft 365 operations portfolio |
| Licensing | Per-admin migration licensing; confirm edition against source coverage. | Modular portfolio pricing; compare only the modules you will operate |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose ShareGate when
- Administrator-led Microsoft 365 migrations
- SharePoint and Teams migration planning and execution
- Practical reports and cleanup workflows
- Teams wanting a focused migration experience
Choose AvePoint when
- Large Microsoft 365 governance programs
- Migration combined with backup, compliance, and lifecycle needs
- Enterprise procurement and platform consolidation
- Complex operational control across Microsoft 365 data
Detailed Comparison
Migration execution
ShareGate: Strong focus for SharePoint/Teams migration teams.
AvePoint: Strong but often part of a larger platform conversation.
Governance breadth
ShareGate: Useful management/reporting capabilities.
AvePoint: Broader governance and data management portfolio.
Operational simplicity
ShareGate: Often attractive for admin-led workstreams.
AvePoint: Often attractive for enterprise program standardization.
Procurement fit
ShareGate: Fits where migration and admin tooling is the main need.
AvePoint: Fits where multiple Microsoft 365 control needs are bundled.
Architecture Differences
Both tools sit outside Microsoft 365 as administrative and migration platforms that connect to tenant workloads through supported APIs and permissions.
The architecture choice depends less on a feature checklist and more on governance operating model, migration scale, and post-migration administration needs.
For broader design context, visit the Migration Hub.
Can They Be Used Together?
Usually not — these tools are evaluated as alternatives. Running both concurrently is rare. Pilot one against your source data and governance requirements, then standardize.
Licensing Considerations
Both are third-party tools. Licensing should be validated directly with the vendor against tenant size, workloads, products, term, support level, and required modules.
Decision Matrix
Related Questions
Related nxtM365 Guides
Sources
- ShareGate help center, ShareGate
- AvePoint Fly content migration, AvePoint